The Next-Wave Ezine: Issue #86

current issue index




next-wave |  about |  bookstore |  archived |  advertise |  charlie wear's notes |  links February 2006
Why Emerging Churches are Nonviolent
 
 
In my interviews with churches in the West, those that highly engage culture, I've noticed that none or very few were of the just-war perspective when it came to issues of war and peace. If they were not outright pacifists, they leaned that way, and much of their talk reflected that nonviolence was consistent with their overall set of Christian practices. Some critics dismiss emerging churches' disposition towards nonviolence as simply part of an unthinking liberal agenda of some sort. I disagree. I think the emerging churches move towards peacemaking is rooted in something much deeper than than any sort of knee-jerk political reaction.

Looking back In Christian history, there have been two primary positions towards war, the just-war position rooted in Augustine's thought, and the position of non-violence rooted in the life of Jesus and the early church. Just-war advocates appeal to Old Testament kingdom understandings or to a church and state synthesis that began in the West in the early fourth century and continued until the middle of the twentieth century. Pacifism or nonviolence was the standard position of Jesus, Paul, and the countercultural church of the first two to three centuries. It has existed as a minority view within the period of Christendom.

Many Western churches operate today as if Christendom still existed. They fulfill their ever-diminishing role as spiritual chaplain to the society, baptizing the goals of the nation as a whole and by encouraging people to play nice. Those churches that are not a direct benefactor of Christendom, those minority faith traditions in the West and those outside the West, lived much differently -- simply to survive. They couldn't baptize the nation's goals because they weren't part of those goals. They needed a different set of narratives to give shape to their lives. Instead of the Christendom story, they chose the scriptural stories of God's people who were not in power. The very existence of their community served as a prophetic witness to the nation as a whole, both in Scripture, and today. Sometimes the witness was overt, such as with Dr. Martin Luther King, sometimes it was unspoken, simply by embodying a different way of life.

The Emerging Church movement is one of the first truly post-Christendom movements in the West. Emerging churches do not lament Christendom's demise nor do they desire its return. They do not seek a favored place in their nation's capitol, although they live highly political lives. They do not draw lines in the culture war, but they live the Jesus-life within all of culture. They do not look to historic Christendom positions on war or any other issue as their referents, as they have little relevance for a Christ follower in a post-Christendom world. The primary narrative of emerging churches is the Jesus story, continued today. Not a 'spiritualized' Jesus who only lives in the heart or in ecstatic experience, but a Jesus who served by example, who confronted the powers, in community, through a countercultural way of life that demonstrated hospitality to the outcast. To be a gospel-like church in post-Christendom, i.e. to be a Christ-following community at the margins that prophetically embodies and engages all of life, is to be a community of peacemakers, regardless of how that plays out in any particular nation's political landscape.


Ryan Bolger serves as the Academic Director of the Master of Arts in Global Leadership and as Assistant Professor of Church in Contemporary Culture, in the School of Intercultural Studies, Fuller Theological Seminary. He teaches classes on emerging church, postmodern/global culture, apologetics, strategy, Jesus as missionary, and U2. "I am a family man, a professor, and on my best days a follower of Jesus."

 


RECENT COMMENTS


"Pacifism or nonviolence was the standard position of Jesus, Paul, and the countercultural church of the first two to three centuries." Though we have been taught this for ages, when you study the Life of Jesus closely and in the context of society in that day, you will find He was often quite confrontational. For example, the incident of Him driving the money changers out of the temple, was when you read all the accounts coldly premeditated. Turning the other cheek was not an act of meekness, but of defiance. (Most people are right handed, therefore if some one is to hit you on the right cheek, it would likely be a backhand blow. To strike such a blow in that society was to imply that person was no more than a dog. To turn the other cheek said "No if you strike me, you strike me as an equal." Likewise when understood in their cultural context, walking the extra mile and giving them your shirt too were agressive, but of necessity, non-violent acts.

"Brutal Israeli regime"? Have you ever really studied the history of Israel? Not the sanitized drivel in modern text books, but the hard facts. The truth is they have been attacked time and again, literally from the first days of their existence. (Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon attacked Israel within a day of their independence.) Have you ever asked the Israeli people what they want? I have a number of Israeli friends, (and I am proud to call them friends), and I can tell you that what they want is to live at peace with their neighbors. When was the last time you saw an Israeli suicide bomber? They are not the ones conducting acts of terror against women and children. Nor are they the ones who have proclaimed they will only be happy when their opponents are totally obliterated and cast into the sea.

This may not have made me popular, oh well ... I'm not running for office anyway. Mostly I have read nothing but good stuff here, but please, let's check the facts out first?


I think that a lot of Christians nowadays swear their allegence to Just War Theory because it gives them an excuse to support the latest war against the Muslim world. If they really understood REAL just wat theory they would know that the current war and 90% of all wars fought by Christian majority countries since the time of St. Augustine were and are unjust.

People are tempted by Christian pacifism because real just war theory is abused. Most evangelical churches nowadays are bloodthirsty because their dispensational millenialism causes them to be cheerleaders for the brutal Israeli regime. Then, of course the sin of praising unjust violence becomes a bad habit. Pat Robertson goes from approving the killing of Arabs and Palestinians to calling for the assinantion of the President of Venezuela, a predictable progression.


Copyright © 2010 Next-Wave Ezine.
All rights reserved.


Next-Wave Ezine - Issue #86
Editorial
 
Issue Credits
 
 
Cover Story

Interview with Steve Sjogren: Back from death, a pastor shares what he has learned about life
 
 
Featured Article: Spotlight
The Porpoise Diving Life
 
 
Culture
Nobody Likes You When You're 23: The Aging Adolescent
 
 
Emerging Church
What I Mean When I Say 'Emerging-Missional' Church
 
Resonances with the Emerging Church
 
Seven Habits of Successful Emerging Discussions
 
Together apart - managing generational differences without breaking up
 
Why Emerging Churches are Nonviolent
 
Cries in the Wilderness: On what it means to be 'Emerging'
 
 
Reviews
Book Review: Under the Overpass by Yankoski and Purvis
 
 
Kingdom Living
Five Sundays with Jesus
 
 
From the Archives
That's not Community!
 
 
Real Life
Hope as a new pair of shoes
 
 
Column
Eutychus Report: Third Millenium Church Movements
 
 
Book Excerpt
The Day I Died: Chapter 1
 
Story: Recapture the Mystery
 
 
Evangelism
Everyone needs a friend like Kimm
 
An open letter to Stephen Baldwin